🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Reconsider Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also vacated a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the authority and justification to deploy national guard forces in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have command of the situation.

Contrary to descriptions of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting footage of scenic paths and a thriving food scene, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city issued two legal injunctions this month – one blocking the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to evade the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – permitting control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” said the legal representative in a statement.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, principles, and autonomy as this legal proceeding progresses and our legal battle continues in the courts.”